Kevin Pietersen and Jonathan Trott’s form slump England’s biggest worry
How the No3 and No4 batsmen respond to their disappointing series could be a key to the team’s immediate future
That was an extremely impressive performance by South Africa. Not many teams would have been able to respond in such convincing fashion after going 1‑0 down after three Tests and enduring two such frustrating draws along the way. They annihilated England, and Graeme Smith and the management deserve credit for holding the side together as they did.
In this form and on that pitch South Africa’s bowling attack was formidable. That makes it difficult to assess just how poor England’s batting was. Certainly the two low totals should not deflect attention from the team’s other flaws. The decision to leave out Graham Onions was puzzling. His close-to-the-wicket bowling style and ability to move the ball off the seam would have made him perfectly suited to the conditions at the Wanderers. And the bowlers who did play did not perform as well as they should have.
Clearly, though, England have one big concern. That is the form of Jonathan Trott and Kevin Pietersen at No3 and No4. Pietersen has had a tour he will want to forget. Before the series had started, he asked me if I would be able to work with him to help correct some technical issues in his batting. As I am contracted as a consultant to South Africa I had to refuse, but it is clear to me that there are two glitches he should work on.
Firstly, he has been getting too low in his stance at the crease. He is bending his knees too much. In any game played with a moving ball, it is crucial to keep the head and the eyes still. In cricket a batsman needs to keep his gaze as parallel to the ground as possible. Because Pietersen is dropping so low, he has to rise up again as the ball is coming at him. His eyes are travelling in the opposite direction to the trajectory of the delivery, moving up as the ball is coming down. This is affecting his ability to properly judge line and length.
The second problem is that he is moving his feet too early, before the bowler has even bowled. That means he is getting into position and then having to wait for the ball to reach him. There should a rhythm to hitting the ball. That is why I always advocated the use of a Read more…

![[Facebook]](http://blogs.cmdn.com/cricket/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/facebook.png)
![[del.icio.us]](http://blogs.cmdn.com/cricket/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/delicious.png)
![[Digg]](http://blogs.cmdn.com/cricket/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/digg.png)
![[MySpace]](http://blogs.cmdn.com/cricket/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/myspace.png)
![[Reddit]](http://blogs.cmdn.com/cricket/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/reddit.png)
![[StumbleUpon]](http://blogs.cmdn.com/cricket/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/stumbleupon.png)
![[Twitter]](http://blogs.cmdn.com/cricket/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/twitter.png)
![[Yahoo!]](http://blogs.cmdn.com/cricket/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/yahoo.png)