On paper, nothing seems wrong with the Indian cricket team selected for the T20 World Cup beginning next month. All the right-sounding names are marked present. But dig a little deeper: this is a team selected on reputation, not form.

  To begin with, T20 demands athleticism from every player. Tell me, how many in this team are good fielders. Barring Ravindra Jadeja and Suresh Raina, nobody can be listed A class.

  We also have Dinesh Karthik and Rohit Sharma, two players who have got unlimited opportunities in the past, again waltzing into the squad. How can the two be preferred over Virat Kohli beats me. Neither of the three have done anything special in the ongoing IPL3 but Virat, at least, was in great form in just-concluded ODIs. He is also a far superior fielder than either of the two. One thing is certain: the selectors love Karthik and Sharma.

  Yuvraj Singh’s selection is also a gamble. He is out of batting form and not half the fielder he used to be. But then he is a proven performer. His bowling too has improved leaps and bounds. Let us hope he comes good.

  The bigger gamble is opting for brittle-as-glass Nehra. Agreed, he is a sharp bowler. But he is such a sub-par fielder and batsman that his overall value is highly suspect.

  I am also surprised at Piyush Chawla’s selection. He has been far from impressive in IPL3. Chawla is a good spinner but he bowls at least 1-2 loose deliveries every over. That can be fatal in T20. In any case with both Harbhajan and Jadeja around, he will be sitting in the sidelines.

  This team is largely made up of players who have already established themselves in their respective ‘cricket-corporate’ careers. Barring a few, T20 World Cup 2010 will be just another tournament for them. Which is why this team seems to lack hunger.

  I would have loved to see young, in-form players like Manish Pandey in the squad. In their batting, you can see a burning desire to make a mark. That’s what the champion team of 2007 had. And that’s what this team lacks. Even Pakistan’s 2009 team succeeded only because it had a great balance of rookies and experience and a larger reason to play for. The selectors have played safe by opting for familiar names. But I hope it hasn’t come at the cost of India.

  After the money-minting, energy-sapping IPL3, what does Team India play for?

  I am hoping that the genius of Sehwag will rescue us. I am also putting my money on Yusuf Pathan, Ravindra Jadeja, Vinay Kumar (if he gets a chance) to come up with outstanding performances. Not because they are the best players in the team. But because they still have something to prove.

  The selectors have done one good thing though. They have dropped Ishant Sharma.

  Team India Squad: MS Dhoni (c), Virender Sehwag, Gautam Gambhir, Yuvraj Singh, Suresh Raina, Yusuf Pathan, Dinesh Karthik, Ravindra Jadeja, Zaheer Khan, Praveen Kumar, Ashish Nehra, Harbhajan Singh, Piyush Chawla, Vinay Kumar, Rohit Sharma

  My team:  MS Dhoni (c), Virender Sehwag, Gautam Gambhir, Yuvraj Singh, Suresh Raina, Yusuf Pathan, Virat Kohli, Manish Pandey, Ravindra Jadeja, Zaheer Khan, Praveen Kumar, R P Singh, Harbhajan Singh, Vinay Kumar, Irfan Pathan. 

  (PS: I know there's only one wicket-keeper in my team. No big deal. If there's a crisis, Parthiv Patel or Wriddhiman Saha can be flown in)

Avijit Ghosh Twenty20 Blogs.CMDN.com, Cricket, Cricket Blogs, Twenty20

India has just scored an emphatic 2-0 victory over Bangladesh. Barring the opening day of the two-Test series that witnessed a middle-order collapse, India were pretty much on top for most of the series.

      Nonetheless, the series also exposed certain chinks in our armour. We need to work on them as sterner test awaits us against South Africa beginning with the first Test on February 6. After all, the series is being billed as the battle for the champion Test team in the world.

      1. Middle-order batting:  Due to injuries, our middle order is suddenly looking brittle. Ok, we have Tendulkar in great nick. But Dravid, Laxman and Yuvraj are likely to miss the first Test. Indications are Yuvraj will miss the entire Test series. So what do we do?

      I think India has adequate bench strength. The question is whether the selectors will go for the real guys or opt for their favourites. If the selectors think that Dinesh Karthik, that little darling of the five wise men, will shore up the middle order, then God help India.

      Sure, we need experience. But I am not saying, call back Ganguly. Or even Mohammed Kaif.

      I have four fresh names: Cheteshwar Pujara, S Badrinath, Manish Pandey and Manoj Tiwary. The last three are among the finest fielders in India.

      Pujara and Badrinath are the two unluckiest cricketers in India today. Each of them has scored centuries by dozens. Badrinath, especially, has also proved his worth during India A tours abroad. Obviously either the selectors don't like his face or they know about a major chink in his batting that nobody else can find on television. I know he is 29 but so what? Even Mr Cricket, Michael Hussey made his Test debut at 30.

      Both Badrinath and Pujara are tailor-made for Test cricket. They have solid defence, decent footwork and play the ball on merit. They can graft and build a long, patient innings. Surely, both deserve a chance.

      Pandey and Tiwary are two of a kind. Both have the game to succeed on the big stage. After his recent stunning ton in the Ranji Trophy, Pandey is high on confidence too. Tiwary has fallen off the mindmap. But his 102 off 123 balls for East Zone against Central Zone, shows Read more...

Avijit Ghosh India, South Africa Bangladesh, Blogs.CMDN.com, Cheteshwar Pujara, Cricket, Cricket Blogs, Dinesh Karthik, Dravid, Ganguly, India, Laxman, Manish Pandey, Manoj Tiwary, Mohammed Kaif, Rahane, Raina, Rohit Sharma, S Badrinath, South Africa, Virat Kohli, Yuvraj

Pakistan are the current T20 world champions. Shahid Afridi, Umar Gul, Mohammed Aamer, Saeed Ajmal and company played some enthralling cricket to claim the trophy last year. Since then, Pakistan have seen another exciting batsman emerge on the horizon: Umar Akmal. Therefore, it defies logic that nobody wanted to buy the 11 Pakistani players in the IPL 3 auction on Tuesday.
 
What's the reason? Let us go through what has been proffered by the men and women involved with IPL. Some team owners have said that the Pakistani players had a problem of availability during the period. That's nonsense. Unlike the top Aussie players, they are available for the entire duration. In fact, West Indian Kemar Roach, a Deccan Chargers buy, will miss the first two games. That's because the Zimbabwe tour of West Indies gets over on March 14 while IPL 3 begins on March 12.  The second Deccan Chargers game will be held on March 14.
 
Another gentleman was heard mouthing that the Pakistanis were not chosen because this was a short auction. There were too few players to be bought, he said. This logic doesn't hold either. The truth is that the owners spent sums as high as $720,000 and $610,000 for the likes of Parnell and Roach, while ignoring Aamer and Gul. Are we saying that the former two are better bowlers than Aamer (who is also emerging as a handy bat) and Gul? Or that the Pakistanis are not even worth $100,000? And have we forgotten that Afridi was the man of the series in the T20 World Cup 2009.
 
One logic being offered is that franchisees were not keen to have Pakistani players because there is an element of uncertainty involving them. Simply put, the relationship between the two countries is already edgy and could always get worse. In that case, the Pakistani players might go back. So why take the trouble?
 
Even this argument is specious. Sure, nobody would want to invest a huge amount in a 'risky' player. But then isn't investing over $750,000 in Keiron Pollard any less risky? What's the guarantee he will succeed? What about investing $750,000-plus in Bond, once a great bowler, now extremely injury prone. Let us not forget he's currently injured too. Besides, he Read more...

Avijit Ghosh IPL, Pakistan Blogs.CMDN.com, Bond, Cricket Blogs, Deccan Chargers, IPL, Keiron Pollard, Kemar Roach, Mohammed Aamer, Pakistan, Saeed Ajmal, Shahid Afridi, T20, Umar Akmal, Umar Gul

Rejoice. After 77 years of trying, we are finally No 1 in the ICC Test cricket rankings.  A 2-0 victory over Sri Lanka in a three Test series makes you feel real good.

Here's a review of the series:

Like Sehwag, MS Dhoni often doesn't get much credit for what he does for the team and the country. I agree that the Indian captain's batting style is pretty ungainly. But can anyone doubt its efficacy? Both his centuries were crucial to the team's cause - the 110 in Ahmedabad took India to a position of relative safety; his 100 in Mumbai ensured that Murali wouldn't be able to take a second shot at us. Why complain about methods when it gives you the right results?

The best thing about Dhoni is his level-headedness. At the post-match interview, he told Ravi Shastri that maintaining the No 1 position would be the real challenge. That's a leader with a vision. I would reiterate, make him the captain till the 2011 World Cup.

I was also surprised that Shastri got Tendulkar for the interview immediately after the match. It was good listening to the world's highest run scorer. But I was expecting someone like Dravid.

Dravid's contribution in the series was second to none.  His 177 saved us in the first Test. Otherwise, we might have had a totally different end to the contest.  He had another ton in the second Test and scored 70 plus again in the third.  We saw a new Dravid this time - he was ready to be more aggressive, more adventurous.  One would have liked to know what really brought about the change in his attitude. So why not him? Why does he have to be in the shadows every time?

Two factors clearly went in our favour in this series. Our catching, as Dhoni too pointed out, was pretty good.  Unlike the Lankans who were surprisingly butterfingered, we snapped up nearly everything.

The umpiring decisions, especially in the third Test, also went much in our favour. I would say, it made a difference to the outcome. Dilshan got two rank bad decisions in Mumbai. If something like that had happened to one of our top batters, we would have had a national debate. Besides, Dravid and Tendulkar and others also got decisions to their advantage. That surely Read more...

Avijit Ghosh IND vs SL 2011 World Cup, BCCI, Blogs.CMDN.com, Cricket, Cricket Blogs, Dilshan, Dravid, ICC, Kanpur, MS Dhoni, Mumbai, Murali, Pragyan Ojha, Rankings, Ravi Shastri, Sehwag, Shastri, Sreesanth, Tendulkar, Test Cricket, Zaheer

Virender Sehwag is batting on 284; just 16 runs away from the unthinkable. If he scores those runs, he will become the first batsman in the history of Test cricket to score three triple hundreds.

Mind boggling as the feat would be, let us pause for a moment to ask ourselves a simple question: do we, as cricket lovers, really give him the respect that he deserves?

The write-ups that follow any substantial knock by Sehwag are usually flooded with adjectives such as "explosive," "destructive" and "bludgeoning". But such praise hides an obvious truth that the cricket world finds impossible to utter: that the Nawab of Najafgarh is a genius and, perhaps, the best batsman in the world today.

When Sehwag is at the crease, anything seems possible. Like making Murali look like a club bowler. Like almost scoring 300 runs days in less than a single day's play. Like smashing the first three balls he faces on tour for sixes as he did in New Zealand earlier this year. When he hits the fastest ever ODI century by an Indian, again in Kiwiland, it is almost expected.

But a much larger pool of facts illustrates why he is the world's most feared batter today.

Sehwag is the only current batsman in international cricket with two Test triple tons. Both were scored at breathtaking speed against respectable attacks: Pakistan and South Africa. He is a more prolific "big" innings player than anybody in world cricket. Twelve of his last 13 hundreds have been 150 plus: 284 not out, 131, 201 not out, 319, 151, 180, 254, 201, 173, 164, 155, 309, 195.

Not one of these is against Bangladesh or Zimbabwe.

Barring one, each innings had a strike rate of 70 plus, amazing by Test standards. The 319 against South Africa in Chennai last year had come off just 304 balls - the fastest triple hundred ever scored. In terms of strike rate, not even Sir Donald Bradman had done better.

In his autobiography, All-round View, Pakistan captain Imran Khan said that a batsman must succeed on all kinds of surfaces to be classified as a genuine great. But the reason why he put Vivian Richards ahead of every other batsman in his generation was because he could Read more...

Avijit Ghosh IND vs SL, India Australia, Blogs.CMDN.com, Cricket, Cricket Blogs, Jacques Kallis, Lance Klusener, Makhaya Ntini, Nantie Hayward, Pakistan, Shaun Pollock, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Virender Sehwag, Vivian Richards, West Indies

I have a simple explanation for our ODI series loss. We lost because we did not win one game that we were supposed to win (Mohali) and because we could not hold our nerve in the key moments of the tighter contests (Vadodara and Hyderabad).
 
Come to think of it. MSD and company had everything in their favour. A fully fit batting unit, home conditions and an opposition racked by injuries. No Michael Clark, no Nathan Bracken, no Brad Haddin and mid-series exits of Brett Lee, James Hopes, Peter Siddle, Tim Paine and others -- for all purposes, this was Australia's B team.
 
Yet Ponting's men played like true champions. What a shame MSD's million-dollar boys couldn't even take the series to the wire. Faced with circumstances similar to Australia's, the Men in Blue would have probably lost the series 7-0 or 6-1.
 
Let's analyse the larger reasons for our defeat:
 
1. We lacked batting consistency at the top: Barring MSD, no other batsman played with any degree of consistency. Sehwag offered two blistering cameos but failed to score even a single half century in six knocks. He is a genius but he needs to be shaken out of his comfort zone. Similarly, barring his magical 175, Sachin was a disappointment. True, he got a rough decision at Mohali but what about the other knocks? Gambhir started brightly with 68 and 76 but ended up with 6, 8 and 0. Yuvraj played one fabulous match-winning knock in Delhi but had little else to offer. With the new Fab 4 failing regularly, India were bound to struggle.
 
Now compare their performance with the three key Australian players at the top: Watson, Ponting and Hussey. Watson scored 5, 19, 41, 49, 93 and 49, apart from claiming a bagful of wickets. Ponting notched up 74, 12, 59, 52, 45 and 25, while Hussey made 73, 53, 81, 40, 31 not out and 35 not out. These three seldom allowed Indian bowlers to have an early view of Read more...

Avijit Ghosh Australia, IND vs AUS, India Amit Mishra, Blogs.CMDN.com, Cricket, Cricket Blogs, Delhi, ett Lee, Gambhir, Guwahati, Harbhajan, Hussey, Ishant Sharma, James Hopes, Michael Clark, Mohali, MSD, Nathan Bracken, Nehra, ODI, Peter Siddle, Ponting, Pragyan Ojha, Praveen Kumar, Sachin, Tim Paine, Vadodara, Yuvraj, Zaheer Khan

India's Saturday triumph against Australia is immensely satisfying. The pitch was tricky. And the top 3 batters failed. But Yuvraj and Dhoni played with composure and intelligence. They showed India can be as clinical and professional in a run chase as the Australians. That felt real good.
 
But, again, let us not go overboard. This is our first XI, minus Zaheer Khan. Almost. But the Aussies were missing at least five top players: Michael Clark, Brad Haddin, Brett Lee, Nathan Bracken, James Hopes. They still put up a good fight. That only highlights the quality of their bench strength. Having played IPL and Champions League, most Aussies are very familiar with Indian conditions now. We won't have much home advantage against them in the 2011 World Cup.
 
My other observations for the match:
 
1. What a knock by MSD! In times when an international match is played almost every other day, there's no time or space in mind's hard drive to build a cache of memory. But three shots played by Dhoni at Feroze Shah Kotla on Saturday night will endure. All of them came after Yuvraj Singh's masterly innings had ended after a dubious decision.
 
The first one was a fierce straight drive, a trifle uppish in the air. But before bowler Peter Siddle could bring his hands together, it had traveled 20 yards ahead. The burly Aussie was lucky. The red cherry could have broken his hand, an injury Ponting can ill afford right now. The second one was a square drive off Johnson, hit with equally savage ferocity. The third, again off Siddle, was what the commentator described as a punch cut, played off the back-foot past cover. Read more...

Avijit Ghosh Australia, Indian Cricket Aussie, Australia, Blogs.CMDN.com, Brad Haddin, Brett Lee, Champions Trophy, Cricket, Cricket Blogs, Dhoni, James Hopes, Michael Clark, MSD, Nathan Bracken, Sehwag, Symonds, Tendulkar, Voges, Yuvraj Singh, Zaheer Khan

If there’s anything like a perfect day, the Men in Blue enjoyed it at Nagpur on Wednesday.  A 99 run win is pretty comprehensive, though, like most Indians, I would have preferred the margin to be 100 or above. With the series tied at 1-1, one can expect a lip-smacking feast in the remaining five games. I have a feeling the series will be decided only in the last game.
 
Ricky Ponting erred badly in electing to field after winning the toss. The defensive ploy came unstuck on a batting paradise. The Indian bowlers looked good in defending 354. But let us not start singing praises till they defend a smaller total or restrict the Aussies to less than 270 when bowling first.
 
My observations on Team India after watching the first two games of the series:
 
1. Earlier this month, the BCCI sacked Robin Singh, India’s fielding coach. On Wednesday, Dhoni’s men showed why we badly needed a new one. The team has too many laggards in the field. The ground fielding is abysmal. Whatever the distance, the throws seldom hit the stumps. And if you are Ishant Sharma, you can even miss from a yard. There are several other below-par fielders in the side. On a good day, Nehra will get 3 out of 10. On one occasion today, Praveen Kumar first missed the ball, then kicked it away. On another occasion he stupidly stepped onto the rope as he caught the ball. Barring Suresh Raina, Ravindra Jadeja and Virat Kohli, we don’t have any quality fielders in the squad. If we want to mount a serious challenge for the 2011 ODI World Cup, we must improve in this aspect.
 
2. Harbhajan Singh needs to be told that his batting cannot cover up for his ineffective, defensive bowling. He needs to get more wickets. The offie bowls like a fifth bowler who thinks that 10-0-50-1 or so is great work. Even Nathan Hauritz and Ravindra Jadeja flight the ball more. Solution: Drop him for a couple of games. Pressure works. See how all the “drop talk” has improved Ishant’s game. Give Pragyan Ojha or Amit Mishra a chance. See if they perform any better. Read more...

Avijit Ghosh Australia, IND vs AUS, India Amit Mishra, Aussies, Delhi, Gambhir, India, Ishant Sharma, MSD, Nagpur, Nathan Hauritz, Pragyan Ojha, Praveen Kumar, Ravindra Jadeja, Ricky Ponting, Robin Singh, Rohit Sharma, Sehwag, Suresh Raina, Virat Kohli, Zaheer Khan

Pakistan played wonderful cricket in the Champions Trophy. But for the dropped catch by captain Younis Khan, they might have well played in the final.
 
But rather than appreciate the team's fine performance in South Africa, some Pakistani politicians are behaving both childishly and churlishly.
 
First, there were wild match-fixing allegations against captain Khan by Jamshed Dasti, Pakistan's Chairman of National Assembly Standing Committee on Sports. Within hours, though, the latter denied making any such allegation.
 
Now Pakistan's Sports Minister Shah Ali has said that India, having been knocked out earlier, influenced the umpires to get arch-rival Pakistan ousted from the tournament. "India took revenge by influencing umpires to help New Zealand win," he has said.
 
One can only draw two conclusions from the statement. Either the minister is a poor loser or he is smart enough to convert the nation's legitimate frustration of loss into a sort of anger against old adversary India.
 
The question is: if India could influence umpires to ensure Pakistan's defeat against the Kiwis, why didn't it do so to win the match against Pakistan in the first place? But then we aren't talking logic.
 
The problem, perhaps, arises from the fact that politicians like Ali aren't really interested in cricket and don't really want a sporting answer to any problem.
 
Those who blame Younis Khan for dropping the simple catch must not forget that even New Zealand's stand-in captain Brendon McCullum dropped a sitter against Australia in the final. That dropped catch, just as in Khan's case, made all the difference between victory and Read more...

Avijit Ghosh India, Pakistan Blogs.CMDN.com, Champions Trophy, Cricket, Cricket Blogs, Jamshed Dasti, New Zealand, Shah Ali, South Africa, Younus Khan

Congratulations, Pakistan! Younis Khan's men deserved to win as much as MS Dhoni's boys deserved to lose in the Champion's Trophy game on Saturday. Pakistan weren't just the better team on paper; they were superior on the pitch too. They outdid India in every aspect of the game, including delivering no-balls.
 
We lost because we played mediocre cricket. And that's because without Zaheer, Sehwag and Yuvraj, we ARE a mediocre team. None of our bowlers is good enough to play for Pakistan. Most of their bowlers can walk into our side. The real problem is that we seem to be satisfied with mediocrity. It requires very little for players like Ishant Sharma or RP Singh to find a place in the playing XI.
 
Sharma seems more interested in restricting runs than taking wickets. Just recall how frequently he gets wickets in his first spell. It has been long since he effectively moved the ball. And he seems to lack the fire to bowl fast. His figures 8-2-39-2 will never reflect how ineffective he was.
 
It is the same story with RP Singh. Without pace and movement, he looks like a lamb to the slaughter. Relatively speaking, Praveen Kumar offers a better package: he is a better batsman, a better fielder and certainly has more craft and variation. But, for some reason, Singh seems to be regularly preferred.
 
And one shouldn't dismiss Harbhajan's 1 for 71 (the wicket came of his last ball) as 'one of those bad days'. Like Sharma, he too prefers to restrict a batsman than attack him. I am aware that he has over 200 ODI wickets and that he grabbed 5 wickets in the Colombo final earlier this month. But how consistently does he make effective bowling contributions? Just look at his bowling record in the last 10 games. Apart from the final, he has seven wickets in the other 9 games. One slow bowler who has really impressed in recent times - with his art as well as Read more...

Avijit Ghosh Champions Trophy, India, Pakistan Blogs.CMDN.com, Cricket, Cricket Blogs, Gambhir, Harbhajan, India, Mohammad Yousuf, Mohammed Amer, MS Dhoni, Pakistan, Praveen Kumar, Raina, Sehwag, Shahid Afridi, Shoiab Malik, South Africa, Umar Akmal, Younis Khan, Yuvraj, Zaheer